[
Little River ] |
|
| Project : |
Little
River |
![]() |
|
| Location : | Manila,
Arkansas |
||
| Date : | |||
Right-Hand Chute Little River drains an Army Corps of Engineers floodway that extends roughly 20 miles from Big Lake near Manila, Arkansas to the Marked Tree Floodway (St. Francis River). Approximately 15 miles downstream from Big Lake, at Rivervale, Arkansas, the floodway constricts and there is an inverted siphon that crosses the river at right angles to the direction of flow. For all but the highest flow rates, the siphon functions as a broad crested weir and thereby controls flow rates and upstream river stages. The Corps of Engineers maintains a stream gauging station at this location. Below Rivervale, the floodway widens again to about 0.6 miles or more. In an effort to protect their lands from flooding, farmers downstream from Rivervale built a dike across the west part of the flood plain to connect to a spoil bank that runs parallel to the river more or less continuously to the Marked Tree Floodway downstream. Farmers upstream from Rivervale alleged that damming the floodplain increased depth and duration of flooding above Rivervale. WILSON HYDRO was retained to determine the effects of damming the right overbank area of Right-Hand Chute Little River downstream from Rivervale, Arkansas on depth and duration of flooding upstream. |
WILSON
HYDRO performed water-surface profile modeling in the reach between the
Marked Tree Floodway and Rivervale so as to estimate the effect of damming
the right overbank on tailwater elevations at the inverted siphon (hereafter
called "weir"). The purpose was to determine if damming would
cause the weir to be submerged and thereby decommission its effectiveness
as a hydraulic control device. A submergence of 80 percent was assumed
to be the threshold at which the weir would cease to function as a hydraulic
control. WILSON HYDRO also evaluated changes in the stage-discharge rating
over time to determine if rating shifts could be associated with the construction
of the dike downstream from the weir.
Analysis of the stage-discharge rating was inconclusive, but the water-surface profile analysis showed that damming the right-bank floodplain would substantially reduce the threshold flow rate at which weir submergence at Rivervale occurs. Therefore, damming the floodplain downstream from Rivervale increases the upstream flood hazard. |